Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Homie

March 2, 2008

Lost my cellphone last month, so we trekked to the Verizon store for a replacement. Blue-eyed, sandy-haired Nelson, dead-ringer for my oh-so-Irish-looking cousin Tom Costello., shepherded me through the upgrade. Twenty if he was a day, and new on the job, Nelson was chipper and personable, and endlessly charmed by my middle daughter R., and her non-stop patter and high octane enthusiasm. I pegged him for a college kid from upcounty. I felt a kinship. His resemblance to cousin Tom established a tribal connection. An entire narrative evolved without conscious effort.

My husband mixed it up a bit, adding an earpiece and new charger for his Blackberry to the sale. My paperwork seemed endless, but the sales pitch was low key. Affable Jalal, a senior sales guy, together with the weekend manager, a white guy like Nelson, stepped in when Nelson needed an assist, but the transaction ended smoothly. As we wrapped up, Nelson urged me to call if I had any questions, or needed to change the package, or to add minutes, or if I found the old phone and wanted to come back and transfer my address book to the new phone. He handed me his card, apologizing for the inky scratches. “Since I’m so new here, I have to write my name on the card. Here you go.” I took the card.

Illegible ink squiggled across the the print. I squinted. Baffled, I looked up. I pointed to the card. “Who’s that?” “that’s me,” said Nelson. I pointed to the cursive. Jalal Aboo. My narrative collapsed. My inner ethno-meter spun wildly. A million conjectures and warm fuzzies and our ancient Celtic connection dissolved in a mash of confusion and bewilderment. Egyptian? Palestinian? Second generation? But that suburban affect! The college-boy ease! The unself-consciousness. The All-American grin. My cousin’s double! Aboo? Jalal? Like . . . Abdul, but with– those sky blue eyes? I gestured at his lapel.

He looked at his pin. He nonchalantly removed it. “Oh, Nelson and I were playing around this morning, swapping name tags. We just forgot to switch back.” He grinned. He swapped pins. Jalal, my Irish homie, happily affixed his name to his pocket.

Criticism

January 31, 2008

Enough with the commentary and analysis. Make way for criticism! Went back to grad school today, plunging right in with English 602: “Critical Theory and Literary Criticism.” U Md. let me take classes in graduate school on “advanced special status.” My tax dollars at work! (We’ll see if I’m still “special” after 14 weeks.) My fellow students are a nice mix –theater majors, poets, comp. lit scholars, and a few brash young PhD students who naturally knew the secret to finding the textbook before the first class, even before the prof. posted the info. The professor is, well, a self-described Theory “Jane” (not Jock, thank you very much) whose first hour lecture seemed devoted  to scaring us into dropping the class. I have confidence that my classmates will stay put, or even urge their friends to register! We’ll bloody well learn from divine Professor S!

Blog for Choice

January 22, 2008

My darling daughter N. reminded me that today is “blog for choice” day, in honor of the anniversary of Roe v. Wade and in observance of the importance of freely (yes, that’s my word–freely) available contraception and family planning for all women. Unlike Senator Hilary Clinton, who departs from her otherwise strong pro-choice record by declaring every abortion a “tragedy”, I join feminist writer Katha Pollitt in stating that abortion is desirable and necessary. Full stop.

Known Associates

January 13, 2008

“It’s not what you know, it’s who you know,” so goes the old saw. My political bona fides span four decades, three states, and two continents. Here are some of the public figures whose paths I’ve crossed since my Missouri childhood.

Our Catholic Archbishop for the Springfield-Cape Girardeau Archdiocese in the 70s and 80s was a Bostonian named Bernard Law. The Vatican sent a series of up-and-comers through that Ozarks posting, a hardship position and a great training ground for Bishops of potential rising through the ranks. Truly the “buckle of the Bible Belt,” Springfield boasted the world headquarters of the international Assemblies of God, sponsor of the local affiliate Evangel College. Two other fundamentalist colleges graced our fair city, Central Bible College, and Baptist Bible College (alma mater of the late Jerry Falwell.) The President of Evangel College in whose years was a man named Ashcroft, whose son graduated the Springfield public schools before heading off to Yale, and Yale Law, of whom more later.

Bishop Law’s predecessor, a kindly, bald and bespectacled fellow named Baum, bounded off to Rome from Springfield, landing a high level policy job and his Cardinal mitre with barely an intermediate stop in Kansas City. The Vatican welcomed him as “Cardinelli Boom.” Cardinal Law also launched his rocket climb up the hierarchy from his seat as Archbishop of Springfield-Cape Girardeau. After Springfield, Bishop Law rose to Cardinal and Archbishop of Boston, where, sadly, he gained notoriety for his morally bankrupt, his politically inept, obstructionist rejection of allegations of priestly child abuse in his archdiocese. Law ended up in Rome, after all, put out to a pasture by a Vatican desperate to keep him out of sight and equally desperate to quell the Catholic public uproar.

My connection to Law dated back in the mid-1970s, when Law was counselling my sweetheart Mike S. (who dubbed Law “Bernie”) during Mike’s years in priesthood prep at St. Meinrad’s Seminary in rural Indiana. Bernie often reminded Mike that Bernie, originally from Boston, attended Harvard before he enrolled in his own ecclesiastical studies. Bernie spoke of those years with a wink-and-a-nudge, innuendo that was reassuring to a seminarian struggling with a future of forced celibacy. I recall Mike taking me by Law’s archdiocesean offices in downtown Springfield for an introduction and visit, and I would like to believe no wink or nudge passed between the men that day.

Incidentally, Mike’s late father, a public school educator, was a social studies teacher in his early career. One of his prized students at Study (rhymes with “Judy”) Junior High, on Springfield’s North side, was none other than the young John Ashcroft. As he lay ill with cancer, Mr. S. still referred to Ashcroft fondly as one of “his boys.” By then, Ashcroft had been elected to county, then statewide office,well on his way on the trajectory that (he credited Jesus for fueling) put him in the Attorney General’s seat in George W. Bush’s first term. I later wondered whether then-Missouri Attorney General Ashcroft ever met with then Bishop Law, in those quiet years before both burst onto the national scene. My father played pick-up basketball games with Ashcroft from time to time from the 1960s through the 1980s on the campus of what was then Southwest Missouri State College. Ashcroft avoided the draft by teaching business at SMS for a few years in the 60s; my dad was an English lit. prof. there his whole career.

My mother attended Wal-Mart shareholder’s meetings in Arkansas in the 1980s. She met Bill Clinton at one such meeting. Mom described looking up at the “best looking man she’d ever seen.” Bill Clinton taught my friend Marin’s Constitutional Law class at the University of Arkansas in Fayetteville in the 1980s. Marin did not ask Professor Clinton for a reference at the end of the semester. Marin’s friend, who did, won a cushy job at State in 1993.

In the late 80s, my Chicago chum E. became the first chief of staff for a newly-created ABA Commission on the Status of Women in the Law, whose champion and creator was the wife of Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton, his Yale Law School classmate Hilary Rodham. Rodham added “Clinton” to her name, made her fortune in commodities trading, left her mark on the ABA, then returned to Arkansas to tackle the state’s education system. E.stayed at the ABA, but moved from the Commission on Women into the Torts division by the mid-1990s. By 1992, Governor Bill embarked on his presidential campaign, back in the days the primary season stretched from February to August. E. and her then-husband, an aspiring Chicago Alderman , hosted a series of small gatherings to introduce candidate Bill Clinton to the locals providing my one and only chance to meet Mrs. Clinton. I saw her up close in an event at the executive offices of the YWCA in early April of that year.

Ah, the Chicago years. Those were the days. My book group included the future wife of Rahm Emmanuel.My closest friend in Chicago–who coincidentally attended high school with Rahm–married a speechwriter for a Democratic presidential frontrunner. Our 1988 Wedding guest roster included one sitting and one future member of Congress; several Illinois legislators, one sitting and one future Chicago Aldermen; the eventual chief of Staff to mayor Daley; an eventual Evanston School Board Member; Congressional staffers; policy wonks, and various other unsavory types. I had been an attorney for the City of Chicago in the exciting days of the progressive administration of Harold Washington, the Black mayor of Chicago who unseated the political machine.The following year I went to work for the venerable Leon M. Despres, who had been the most notable and accomplished dissident Alderman to oppose the first Mayor Daley in the 50s, 60s, and 70s. In 1990 my husband, who had worked for a Congressman, then an alderman, then as a lobbyist for a consumer group, was a volunteer fundraiser and supporter of the upstart U.S. Senate campaign of the late, great Paul Wellstone.

These days, my connections are remote, the politics tame. Having moved to Australia for three key years in the late 90s, then relocated to the Washington, DC area on return stateside, the Chicago glory days of political elbow-rubbing are but a distant memory. These days I even have to scrape up connections to Republicans: my mother-in-law’ friendship with Richard Armitage’s mother-in-law; my brother’s former job as pitchman for Amway products under Doug Wead, who later becaume a staffer in George W. Bush’s first term; or my college chum who served as a town council member in her Pittsburgh suburb.

The elected officials I now encounter run along the lines of our PTA executive board. In a company town where government is the industry, rubbing elbows with politicians seems like work–and triggers yawns, not thrills. Oh, I’m officially a “Friend” of an impressive freshman member of Maryland’s House of Delegates, Tom Hucker. And I finally stepped up to the plate to campaign for Donna Edwards, an exciting progressive challenger to our sclerotic incumbent Congressman. True, my oldest and dearest friend in DC is an elected official, but ours is a personal, and not political, connection. I have fun tweaking her Hill colleagues when they see us together at dinner,especially when they appear to worry that I’m “someone” they should remember.

My dear Chicago friend’s husband still writes those Presidential campaign speeches, but most of the elected officials at our wedding have left office. Chicago Mayor Harold Washington died 20 years ago November. We lost our beloved Paul and Sheila Wellstone in 2002. My husband went back to work for the Aussies last year, and I practice law just part-time, on contract, for Maryland and DC employment lawyers who support good Democrats. Politics should be essential, urgent, and vivid. But these days I’m blogging, opining, listing known associates. Taking stock alongside, no longer inside, politics.

Background Check

December 17, 2007

Joe Nocera’s column in Saturday’s New York Times focused on FDIC Chairwoman Sheila Bair, formerly staffer to ex-Senator Bob Dole and more recently a professor at UMass. See the whole story here.

This aside stopped me in my tracks:

“The person the administration had hoped to nominate as chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the nation’s primary bank regulator, was suddenly proving unacceptable. (According to the Washington rumor mill, that choice, Diana L. Taylor, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s companion and, at the time, New York’s superintendent of banking, was nixed by the National Rifle Association, presumably because of Mayor Bloomberg’s antigun stance.)”

But a bit of research and reflection suggests that the story isn’t the grim tale of suffering-because-of-spousal assocations (or, non-spouse) it first seemed. The Times’ lengthy 2006 profile of Ms. Taylor when her FDIC nomination stalled also hinted at the possibility of an NRA veto. See the earlier story here.

 

But the FDIC Chairmanship is subject to Senate confirmation, and the Senate was evenly divided between Rs and Ds back in early 2006. It is easy to imagine a scenario in which the White House congressional liaison advised Bush that no one with anything to do with Bloomberg had a prayer of Senate confirmation. The NRA held tight rein in that chamber, and the White House probably lacked the votes, or the interest in the arm-twisting it would take to counter NRA opposition. Bair, the final pick, had Senate ties, presumably a plus for the 50 Republicans (and several pro-gun Dems) whose votes were key.

Yes, it’s annoying that Ms. Taylor’s nomination was withdrawn because of the actions of her friend Bloomberg, and nothing to do with her views, personal or public. There was no suggestion she ever personally lobbied for or advocated for or in any way spoke out about gun control. She’s no Sarah Brady or Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy. Taylor’s passionate policy pronouncements seem to have run the gamut from denouncing excess banking fees to urging greater access to banking services for immigrants. No, she was the victim of NRA payback to Bloomberg, pure and simple.

But the Bush Administration will happily name persons to influential policy posts irrespective of the politics or alliances of the person’s spouse, or “companion.” Mary Matalin, counsel to Vice President Cheney, and wife of notorious Democratic Consultant and pundit James Carville comes to mind. Josh Bolten, White House chief of staff is another example.  Libby Copeland reported in an Aug 29, 2006 Washington Post story last year that  Bolten’s live-in girlfriend Dede McClure was a Democrat. Neither Matalin nor Bolten’s appointment was subject to Senate confirmation. And there was no suggestion in either of these cases that either appointee was tainted by her husband or “companion.”

A quick Google search revealed that Ms. Taylor rebounded pretty well from the FDIC mess. She took a job in the private sector, and this June was been named to serve on the FDIC advisory board. Her skills, knowledge, banking experience and formidable talent are already put to good use in helping regulate America’s banks. Maybe the next president, a Democrat, will find a way to keep using her talents, despite her association with a notorious Republican.

Nothing

December 11, 2007

Maira Kalman’s (http://www.mairakalman.com/) wonderful picture book, Hey Willy, See the Pyramids (http://www.mairakalman.com/children/heywilly.html) includes this poignant exchange between little Alexander and his sister Lulu:

“What is nothing?” Her insightful reply: “Nothing is when you are given a very small portion of ice cream by an adult, and you look at the plate and at the adult and you ask for more and the adult says you have a huge portion and you say ‘That’s it? That’s nothing.’ “And that is nothing,” says Lulu.

My friend Sara tells the story of a school reunion she attended in Israel in the late 90s. The reunion goers were Polish Jews, who, like Sara and her family, had been expelled from Poland in the late 1960s or early 1970s in one of the last late 20th century pogroms. Sara landed in Chicago a teenager, speaking absolutely no English. But she duly enrolled in the Chicago Public Schools–Von Steuben High–learned English, graduated, eventually married an accountant, moved to the North Shore suburb of Highland Park, and raised and nurtured three beautiful, successful children. Sara developed a passion for portrait photography, and with her husband supported the arts–theater and architecture in particular. This, while also caring for an aging mother and mother-in-law. In the several years after her youngest left for college Sara built her photography avocation into a small business, and now runs a specialty portrait studio out of her condo. For most of the time since her first child was born 37 some years ago, however, Sara did not have paid work outside the home.

Sara’s Polish diaspora cohort were returning to Israel from all over the world. Her old schoolmates had taken the divergent life paths available to determined immigrants, including gaining professional degrees. Sara noticed a particular name on the list of attendees: a female schoolmate who became a doctor. The doctor was amazingly accomplished and successful , although she never married or had a family, and boasted multiple awards, fellowships, and prestigious appointments. And boast she did. As soon as Sara greeted this classmate, the woman regaled Sara with three decades’ worth of achievements in university and medical school and medical practice and research and more. Finally, the doctor exhausted her supply of fabulous successes to relate. “So, Sara,” she asked, “what have you been doing the last 30 years?” Sara took a long look at her former friend before she replied.

“Oh, nothing.”

Introducing “Broadly Speaking”

December 9, 2007

Welcome to my blog! “Broadlyspeaking” tips my generalist intent, tweaks my feminism, and sounds better than “wide berth,” “big tent,” or “large umbrella.”

Wish me luck.

Experience

December 9, 2007

United States Senator and former First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton touts herself as one of the most “experienced” candidates in the Democratic field. Dana Milbank’s quote in today’s Washington Post profile of her campaign is typical: “Her ‘35 years of experience’ make her ‘the best-qualified and experienced person to hit the ground running.’” Here’’s the link to the full story:href=”http://http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/08/AR2007120801442.html”>

In addition to her own formidable accomplishments–Yale Law, Watergate Committee, children’s advocacy with Marian Wright Edelman, partner at Rose Law Firm, ABA committee work–Senator Clinton heavily underscores the “experience” she gained through opportunites created by her marriage to an elected official–the Governor of a small southern state turned two-term President. More practiced pundits have tried to puncture that balloon by noting that former New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson wins the resume sweepstakes, and that Senators Dodd and Biden both have logged far more years in Congress than Senator Clinton.

Well, of course she’s no Lurleen Wallace, pushed stumbling into the Alabama governorship her term-limited husband could no longer fill, and widely viewed a pawn or puppet of George Wallace’s political machine. Nor is Senator Clinton comparable to Missouri’s Jean Carnahan, who also touted experience from her long marriage and active political partnership with her late husband, Governor Mel Carnahan, but was also pushed forward to fill in for a husband tragically killed before he could complete his own Senate campaign. No one doubts Senator Clinton’s very own and very real drive, ability, policy smarts, ambition, and discipline. No one drafted her on short notice to fill someone else’s shoes.

So why does it stick in my craw that she claims credit for, and “experience” based on the happenstance of being (or, perhaps more accurately, staying) married to Bill Clinton? I finally put my finger on the source of my unease as I revised my own resume in connection with recent job hunting.

I’ve been married nearly 20 years to a finance professional. For nearly 18 of the 20 years he has advised and educated pension fund trustees. More recently he has worked with pension funds on the “sell” side, setting up a US office for an overseas company that makes investments on behalf of its union-owned pension funds. I’ve read my husband’s speeches, met his colleagues, attended conferences, edited his research papers, followed pension fund stories in the business press and popular press, and developed a pretty good, albeit not particularly sophisticated, understanding of some of the issues, strategies, and concerns facing Taft-Hartley jointly trusteed pension funds, public employee pension funds, and other similar institutional investors.

And, if I tried to apply for work in the pension fund industry, based on my so-called “experience,” I guarantee you I’d be hooted out of the room. I might have been by his side, but I wasn’t the one hired for those jobs. And while Hillary Rodham Clinton sat through cabinet meetings, set up shop in the East Wing, and traveled on taxpayer-funded trips all over the world, no one “hired” her for or “elected” her to the job.

And herein lies the feminst’s dilemma. On one hand, a major part of the feminist struggle was to put a stop to derivative status and identity. Calling oneself “Mrs. John Smith” went out with Black and White TV. We middle class, Seven Sister college-educated professionals marched forth to create our own identities, build our own resumes, take credit for our own achievements, and not rely on “some man” for any of that. Senator Clinton has plenty of achievements, for many of which she deserves full–and sole–credit.

Yet another component of feminism was to assign value and meaning and worth to the very real, but also often invisible, unpaid “work” of being the supportive spouse. Years ago the wife of the former president of the University of Massachusetts created quite a stir when she refused to take on the formerly unpaid duties of the president’s wife unless given a title, a salary, and the ability to limit the hours she was expected to be on call as hostess, fund-raiser, and all around assistant to the President.

Our First Lady drew no salary for her very real work in that role, but she wouldn’t have been in that position but for being “Mrs. Bill Clinton.” I have a friend from law school who is married to a six-term member of Congress, but my friend is also a partner in a major U.S. law firm. Under the Hillary Clinton model, my friend could run for Congress when the spouse retires, claiming “experience” from 20 years of marriage to the Member. Somehow I don’t think the voting public in their district would buy it. Regarding Mrs. Bill Clinton, I’m not ready to buy it, either.